SER in Debian VoIP packaging coordination Team

Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
Tue Feb 21 10:00:59 UTC 2006


On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:03:28PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:41:04PM -0200, Caio Begotti wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 19:24, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > > yes, sounds feasible. And if Mark is gonna have a look at it, there's
> > > good chance you'll receive some positive feedback on missing finishing
> > > touches (if any) and then we can just put it into pkg-voip.
> > 
> > Hello there, Kilian. The same would apply for SpanDSP and Unicall packages 
> > too? I have been trying to integrate them in pkg-voip for a long time.
> 
> I'll stress it: Caio has:
> 
> * updates for spandsp (require rebuild of asterisk-spandsp-plugins?)
>   We already have both in pkg-voip
> 
> * a new package of Asterisk's chan_unicall (asterisk-chan-unicall) nd
>   two required libraries from the same source (
>   http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/unicall/ )

Those three packages do not separate between a tarball and a diff. I
also believe that they require a repackage of the original tarball as in
spandsp due to the same reasons.

I repackaged libunicall yesterday (from that tarball, not from original
tarball, as I lacked internet connection). And then I noticed that the
make process does not do any sort of cleaning. Please take a look at the
files in the diff.

It seems that the cdbs you use there expects the build to be under
build-root . Anyway, the cdbs scriptlets and makefiles were overly
complex last time I tried debugging anything with them. Any cdbs expert
in the room?

There are a few other smaller issues, but that's for later.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen     icq#16849755  +972-50-7952406
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com  http://www.xorcom.com



More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list