Processing of spandsp_0.0.2pre25-1_i386.changes

[Caio Begotti]

On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Shouldn't libspandsp1 obsolete libspandsp0 ? (the package from Sarge)

Didn't you guys prefered it like it's now? I just added (to my packages, don't 
know what was sync'ed, though) a simple conflict to them. Although I guess 
would be better to follow other naming scheme. Apt-getting them didn't failed 
for me but, again, using my packages, not the sync'ed stuff.

-- 
Caio Begotti, http://caio.ueberalles.net
EXPECTATIONS OVERRATED