sofia-sip packaging considerations

[George Danchev]

On Saturday 17 June 2006 11:21, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
--snip--
> > Agreed. Kai, propbably it is a good idea to provide such an OpenSSL
> > exception in your COPYRIGHTS file with your next release, e.g. 'that you
> > explicitely allow linking your LGPL code with the OpenSSL library.'
>
> [BTW: anybody looked at gnu-tls?]

Gnu-TLS support is good, but I'm not sure how mature it is for sofia-sip. Will 
be discussed and investigated further of course.

> > Also reimplementing libsofia-sip-ua/ipt/rc4.c and
> > libsofia-sip-ua/su/getopt.c is probably a good idea, as suggested at:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/06/msg00290.html
> >
> > Here goes a little doxygen question, for sofia-sip upstream: do you
> > consider having separately generated documentation for
> > libsofia-sip-ua/docs/ and libsofia-sip-ua-glib/docs/ in your next
> > release, since I have arranged two -doc package for these, but we can
> > easily fallback to one of course. I think separation is a more fine
> > grained approach though, since we can have more than -glib bindings in
> > the future.
>
> Why two -doc packages? Most people won't install the docs anyway. Those
> that do, don't worry about the extra disk space.

On my second thoughts, I admit that you are right... no merit having two -doc 
package, thus a single one is created from now on. 

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB