svn-buildpackage spandsp

[Kilian Krause]

Caio,

Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 15:25 -0300 schrieb Caio Begotti:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:03, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Sounds like you rebuild spandsp instead of unicall to me.
> 
> Yes, I went to building all pkg-voip dependencies before Unicall packages.
> 
> > Then give us the error rather than the above warnings. From what you
> > report I don't see what's wrong.
> 
> I just thought that this warning could be a real error but if it's not, okay 
> for me, since I wasn't really testing spandsp but unicall...

as long as you find a resulting *.deb pacakge, how should this be a
fatal problem to the building?

Moreover, no need to CC me when replying to the list. I do read it.

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20060302/a7bb17ce/attachment.pgp