[Fwd: [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.2.12 and Zaptel 1.2.9 released!]

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:25:57 +0200 Marc Fargas wrote:

> And can a non-free binary come from a "copy" of the main's source
> package but with the non-free ? asterisk-classic, asterisk-bristuff,
> asterisk-nonfree-classic, asterisk-nonfree-bristuff ... what a mess...
> x"D

Sorry, I do not understand your point. Why duplicate the binary
packages in non-free?


> But, if you take the source package from main, add the non-free stuff,
> and package *only* that non-free stuff as asterisk-nonfree would that
> work ? (nokia e60 doesn't work nice without iLBC ... hehe)

Sorry, I do not understand your question. A source package must contain
all source required to build the binary package(s).


Is it only loose speculations, or do you actually think in terms of
concrete Debian packaging logic?

I don't mean to be rude. Just want to know if you honestly want to be
educated or looking at Debian and its opinions definition of "free" from
further away.


 - Jonas

P.S.

Please do not cc me - I am subscribed to the list.

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20060918/22182a63/attachment.pgp