Status of asterisk, asterisk-rate-engine, asterisk-addons, ari

[Kilian Krause]

Faidon,

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 05:10:33AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:

first off, thanks for all that great work. It's wonderful to see more
activity on pkg-voip again!

> asterisk
> --------
> trunk seems OK for Asterisk and contains some bugfixes. I think that we
> should push this to unstable as soon as libpri passes NEW.
> Any objections?
> 
> Note that I will be away starting from tomorrow, so if someone wants to
> upload it before I'm back (if the NEW gets processed), go for it.

No objections. Will do that once I see the NEW unless Mark outperforms
me on the commit. ;)


> zaptel
> ------
> Zaptel should be ready to go in too; I can't see any major holdups.
> OTOH, I haven't runtime tested it yet.
> 
> Tzafrir? I realize that you don't rights to upload; would you like me to
> do it?

So far we've had mostly Tzafrir put it into shape and yell a RFS at us.
From there we'd just recompile and upload, so either of the DDs will do
that when it's considered "ready".


> asterisk-rate-engine
> --------------------
> I was doing some bug triaging and found some serious open bugs (FTBFS!)
> against asterisk-rate-engine which apparently are fixed by Ubuntu.
> I tried fixing them but the package doesn't seem to be in the
> repository, even though it's maintained by pkg-voip.
> 
> Mark is the only one uploader. Mark? Should I svn-inject it, fix it and
> upload it?
> 
> I am unable to test it but I'm willing to take Ubuntu maintainer's word
> for it if you can't test it either.

It's "rate-engine" as Mark already pointed out. Yet, it has been more
than a trivial fix last time I looked. 


> asterisk-addons
> ---------------
> #295210 is a quite old bug requesting res_config_mysql.so.
> SVN has asterisk-addons packaged and it's actually quite fresh, updated
> to 1.4 by Kilian (albeit two versions behind, 1.4.0 vs 1.4.2).
> 
> Should I fix these and upload? What's the holdup all this time?

Sure, that's why it's team maintained. But I've just fixed that myself.


> I have no use for these but I can see why others do and would be nice to
> have all the work that you've spent hours to to get used by others.

Well, there was objections to upload it some long time ago. From there I
remember Tzafrir told me it was kinda ready for upload. I'm not really
sure what the current state is, so I guess he might be able to comment
on this better than me. If it's ready, let's put it into NEW.

-- 
Best regards,
Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20070807/99393b66/attachment.pgp