Status of asterisk, asterisk-rate-engine, asterisk-addons, ari

[Mark Purcell]

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Hello,

Thanks for your work, good to see an injection of commits with pkg-voip.

> asterisk
> --------
> trunk seems OK for Asterisk and contains some bugfixes. I think that we
> should push this to unstable as soon as libpri passes NEW.
> Any objections?

Good!

> zaptel
> ------
> Zaptel should be ready to go in too; I can't see any major holdups.
> OTOH, I haven't runtime tested it yet.
> 
> Tzafrir? I realize that you don't rights to upload; would you like me to
> do it?

I'm using snapsshot here and is working well.

> asterisk-rate-engine
> --------------------
> I was doing some bug triaging and found some serious open bugs (FTBFS!)
> against asterisk-rate-engine which apparently are fixed by Ubuntu.
> I tried fixing them but the package doesn't seem to be in the
> repository, even though it's maintained by pkg-voip.

It's in svn under rate-engine

> Mark is the only one uploader. Mark? Should I svn-inject it, fix it and
> upload it?
> 
> I am unable to test it but I'm willing to take Ubuntu maintainer's word
> for it if you can't test it either.

The main issue was building against mysql, if the ubuntu patch fixes then
lets upload.

> asterisk-addons
> ---------------
> #295210 is a quite old bug requesting res_config_mysql.so.
> SVN has asterisk-addons packaged and it's actually quite fresh, updated
> to 1.4 by Kilian (albeit two versions behind, 1.4.0 vs 1.4.2).

We haven't yet uploaded asterisk-addons to debian, some use the
snapshots version. 

> Should I fix these and upload? What's the holdup all this time?

I guess and ITP and upload would be suitable.

> I have no use for these but I can see why others do and would be nice to
> have all the work that you've spent hours to to get used by others.

Agreed!

> ari
> ---
> SVN has ari but it doesn't seem to be in Debian nor have any changes in
> the last 6 months or so.
> 
> Any pending tasks? Should I/we upload?
> 
> Again, I have no use for it etc.

If it is in a usable state, then yes.  I guess there hasn't been a need,
call for packages, but again it would be nice to have in Debian.


Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20070807/acb44dde/attachment-0004.pgp