Bug#433884: Should not depend on libopenH323, libpt, libSDL, libssl,	libldap, ...
    Mark Purcell 
    msp at debian.org
       
    Sat Jul 21 09:16:50 UTC 2007
    
        - Previous message: Bug#433884: Should not depend on libopenH323, libpt, libSDL, libssl,	libldap, ...
- Next message: Bug#433884: Should not depend on libopenH323, libpt, libSDL, libssl,	libldap, ...
-  Messages sorted by: 
              [ date ]
              [ thread ]
              [ subject ]
              [ author ]
         
  
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Which brings me again to ask: should the main asterisk package depend on
> odbc, postgresql and such, or do we take some of those modules to
> subpackages as well?
The rational for splitting asteirsk-h323 was that the footprint for the 
openh323 depenency libs was very large and the savings justified splitting 
off another package.
The footprint for the dependency libs for odbs, postgresql and the like are a 
lot more reasonable.  But I would be willing to be convinced otherwise.
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20070721/ab580964/attachment.pgp 
    
    
        
	- Previous message: Bug#433884: Should not depend on libopenH323, libpt, libSDL, libssl,	libldap, ...
- Next message: Bug#433884: Should not depend on libopenH323, libpt, libSDL, libssl,	libldap, ...
-  Messages sorted by: 
              [ date ]
              [ thread ]
              [ subject ]
              [ author ]
         
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list