spandsp in experimental
Kilian Krause
kilian at debian.org
Mon Jun 18 09:30:12 UTC 2007
Tzafrir,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:45:59AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Why is spandsp 0.4 in experimental? What will it break to move it to
> Unstable?
it has a completely different API/ABI than the 0.2.x version. Thus the
asterisk-app-fax will no longer build.
> CallWeaver and latest asterisk-spandsp-plugins need spandsp 0.4, I
> believe. Not sur eabout unicall.
Excellent! That was what held me back in putting it into unstable. If
there's new spandsp-plugins, please commit and make them both targetted
at unstable.
--
Best regards,
Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20070618/884f7851/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list