Bug#493057: Consider providing non-bristuff-patched asterisk

[Alessandro Polverini]

> The bristuff patches have caused me some headaches lately (see #493055).
>
> Since bristuff is not very actively maintained upstream
> (http://bristuff.org/index.php/Issues), I wanted to ask if you could
> possibly provide a non-bristuff-patched binary package of asterisk.
>
> The bristuff patched version could still be provided, but I'd prefer
> not to have these patches in the main "asterisk" binary package.
>   
I second this request.

Thanks,
Alex