Bug#534037: asterisk-addons: FTBFS: chan_ooh323.c:261: error: 'struct ast_channel' has no member named 'lock'

[Tzafrir Cohen]

(Not replying to the bug report)

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: asterisk-addons
> Version: 1.4.7-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090620 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
> 
> Relevant part:
> > gcc -o menuselect menuselect.o strcompat.o menuselect_stub.o mxml/libmxml.a mxml/libmxml.a 
> > make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/user-asterisk-addons_1.4.7-1-amd64-lIN93E/asterisk-addons-1.4.7/menuselect'
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user-asterisk-addons_1.4.7-1-amd64-lIN93E/asterisk-addons-1.4.7/menuselect'
> > Generating input for menuselect ...
> > menuselect/menuselect --check-deps   menuselect.makeopts
> > Generating embedded module rules ...
> >    [CC] chan_ooh323.c -> chan_ooh323.o
> > chan_ooh323.c:89: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> > chan_ooh323.c: In function 'ooh323_new':
> > chan_ooh323.c:261: error: 'struct ast_channel' has no member named 'lock'
> > chan_ooh323.c:286: error: 'DSP_FEATURE_DTMF_DETECT' undeclared (first use in this function)

Right. It expects Asterisk 1.4, and gets 1.6.1 .

Should I package asterisk-addons 1.6.1 (released)? Or do we intend to
upload asterisk 1.6.2 (beta3) and thus I should go for 1.6.2 (beta1)?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir