Bug#545948: ptlib: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

Eugen Dedu Eugen.Dedu at pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr
Sat Sep 12 11:18:10 UTC 2009


Hi,

What about applying them to the stable branch too?

Eugen

Robert Jongbloed wrote:
> I am sorry, I saw __GLIBC__ and read __GNUC__ ....
> 
> 
> I have applied the patch to the SVN trunk.
> 
> Note that patch could not be applied to the vsdl.* files, someone else had
> already changed it to something else!
> 
> 
> Robert Jongbloed
> OPAL/OpenH323/PTLib Architect and Co-founder.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Petr Salinger [mailto:Petr.Salinger at seznam.cz]
>> Sent: Friday, 11 September 2009 4:02 PM
>> To: Robert Jongbloed
>> Cc: 'Eugen Dedu'; 545948 at bugs.debian.org
>> Subject: RE: Bug#545948: ptlib: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>>>  Eugen passed on your patches to me to be applied to PTLib, however
>> I have
>>> some concerns about them.
>>>
>>> Now, I had fairly recently received some patches for FreeBSD that
>> had
>>> presumably fixed PTLib to compile for him on his particular flavour
>> of
>>> FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> Now you are asking me to add things like:
>>>
>>> +#if defined (__GLIBC__)
>>> +#define PSETPGRP()  setpgrp()
>>> +#else
>>> #define PSETPGRP()  setpgrp(0, 0)
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Which, if I am reading it correctly, will change the code the other
>>> gentleman had used simply if the GNU compiler is used. Now maybe I
>> am wrong,
>>> but I would be VERY surprised if he was NOT using the GNU compiler.
>> As far
>>> as I am aware the GNU compiler is used by all open source operating
>> systems,
>>> the only people that don't are commercial entities like Sun or
>> Microsoft.
>>> I have never really used any flavour of FreeBSD so I don't know if
>> all this
>>> if fine, but it just doesn't look right to me. I am unwilling to
>> make
>>> patches that I am fairly sure will break someone else's compile.
>>>
>>> If FreeBSD and kFreeBSD are sufficiently different they should
>> probably have
>>> a different define P_KFREEBSD for example.
>> They have same kernel (FreeBSD), same compiler (gcc),
>> but different userspace C library (native FreeBSD/GLIBC).
>>
>> The __GLIBC__ signals used C-library, not compiler,
>> the compiler defines __GNUC__.
>>
>> Therefore these changes will not break previous build on plain
>> FreeBSD.
>> From ptlib view, there are only 2 differences.
>>
>> 1) macro PSETPGRP
>> 2) location of SDL.h
>>
>> The third change is fix of creating shared libraries,
>> otherwise the P_SHAREDLIB is not honored at all.
>>
>> To reduce differences, it is possible to use on both systems
>> #define PSETPGRP()  setpgid(0, 0)
>> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/setpgid.html
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/compat-
>> 43/setpgrp.c
>>
>> Petr
> 








More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list