Bug#542220: simpleopal: Should depend on libpt2.6.4-plugins

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 06:53:49PM +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote:
>Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:31:12 +0200, Eugen Dedu
>> <Eugen.Dedu at pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> For libpt2.6.4, it Suggests.  Do you think it is better to 
>>> Recommends?
>>
>> Recommends will do because aptitude installs Recommends by default. 
>> But that means relying on the default. I'd say simpleopal should 
>> depend on the libpt2.6.4-plugins package because it doesn't work at 
>> all without it.
>
>Are you sure it does not work at all without it?

The criteria for Recommends is that most users use it.

"not working at all" is the criteria for Depends.


Regards,

  - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20090922/b62eae59/attachment-0001.pgp>