Web interface & redudancy for an IPBX under Debian Lenny
Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
henry.nicolas at tourneur.be
Wed May 5 20:37:23 UTC 2010
Hella Diana,
First, thanks a lot for all those precious informations :)
For Hearbeat, I'm speaking about the Hearbeat project, the goal is to run the
IPBX over two physical server and to have a (as much as possible) transparent
failover in case of faillure. I guess I could achieve that goal with
Heartbeat.
But now with what you said I have a problem about using FreeSentral and Yate,
indeed I prefer to avoid using non packaged software (debian point of view) or
non-released software (that point might not be a problem, reading your
remark). Any recommendations about that problem ? Any way to do a clean Yate +
FreeSentral install on Debian stable ?
Thanks,
> Hello Henry,
>
> Actually FreeSentral requires Yate 3 alpha 3 that was just released.
> It's alpha because we still working on a part that is not related to the
> server.
> Yate 1.3 it's very old, maybe 3 years old and a lot of modifications
> have been introduced since than.
> So, Yate 3 it's stable, it's used especially in SS7 carrier setups.
> Right now FreeSentral it's based on PostgreSQL because this is what we
> use. I guess it's doable to port it on MySQL but we didn't found any
> reason to do so.
>
> What do you mean by heartbeat?
>
> fax2mail and mail2fax it's likely to happend in the next FreeSentral
> version.
>
> Diana
>
> Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
> > Thanks everybody for all your replies.
> >
> > Anyway, I prefer to stick with a rocksolid solution, from my experience
> > that's
> > excluding building some SVN version (that would lead me to library
> > dependency issue).
> >
> > So, to resume the situation, I see 2 IPBX packaged within Debian stable :
> > yate (1.3) and asterisk (1.4). If I really need a more recent version of
> > yate, could you tell me why ?
> >
> > Isn't the solution of yate/mysql + hearbeat + FreeSentral good (all with
> > Debian stable package) ?
> >
> > If Yate 1.3 isn't ok, would it be possible to backport the version 2.2
> > from testing ?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > "Miah Gregory" <mace at darksilence.net> Ecrivait:
> >> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 14:25 +0300, Diana Cionoiu wrote:
> >>> Hello Jonas,
> >>>
> >>> No is not.
> >>
> >> Strictly speaking, you should probably declare your vested interests in
> >> Yate.. :P
> >>
> >> Anyway, going back to the initial request, freeswitch should be
> >> mentioned.
> >>
> >> Also consider whether a web based GUI is bringing much to the party in
> >> this instance. You've got fairly in depth requirements, and a GUI is
> >> unlikely to be able to deliver all that you need out of the box.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list
> >> Pkg-voip-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-voip-maintainers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list
> > Pkg-voip-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-voip-maintainers
>
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list