yate is marked for autoremoval from testing
Tzafrir Cohen
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
Mon Jul 28 15:43:14 UTC 2014
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:12:14PM +0300, Paul Chitescu wrote:
> On Fri Jul 25, 2014 18:22:11 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > It takes longer than I have expected.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 09:42:25AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > I did my best: a pending patch to #35733 (on debhelper). Let me know
> > > what you think.
> > >
> > > Also, if anybody has a comment on #737742 (basically: document yate in
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/UnifiedCommunications/DebianDevelopers/UserGuide)
> > >.
> > >
> > > For the record, here is the output of dh_shlibdeps:
> >
> > Actually I had to include them in the package as otherwise the upload is
> > rejected.
> >
> > Another error I get from lintian:
> >
> > E: yate-dev: pkg-config-bad-directive
> > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/yate.pc -fPIC E: yate-dev:
> > pkg-config-bad-directive usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/yate.pc
> > -fno-check-new
> >
> > Why are -fPIC and -fno-check-new needed?
>
> Please note that -fno-check-new and -export-dynamic were removed in Rev. 5886
> (after more than 10 years of being there)
Thanks.
>
> Yate should now compile with clang with just some warnings.
>
> Still no idea why lintian considers -fPIC bad.
I'll override that one.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list