Bug#881269: belr: FTBFS (32-bit, s390x): symbols not as expected

[Aaron M. Ucko]

Source: belr
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source

Builds of belr for 32-bit architectures such as i386 failed because
libbelr.so.1's symbols differed from expectations in a number of
places, even after demangling.  (Architecture-dependent types like
size_t are likely involved.)

The build for s390x (a somewhat idiosyncratic 64-bit architecture)
also encountered errors from dpkg-gensymbols, though in this case the
only discrepancies were a few missing symbols.

You can find details at

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=belr&ver=0.1.3-1

Could you please take a look and account for these differences?

NB: I have not checked whether there are any differences across 32-bit
architectures.

Thanks!

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu