[Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Bug#390862: -bigmem version of xen kernels is
really needed
Pasi Kärkkäinen
pasik at iki.fi
Tue Dec 12 13:18:01 CET 2006
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>
> What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
> non-pae versions with pae versions?
>
> Rationale:
>
> - not increase in archive size or linux-2.6 package build time,
>
> - this will improve compatimility with other distros (consider scenario
> when running FC or RHEL in domU; these distros do ship only pae xen
> kernels, according to
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/2006-December/000998.html)
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraXenQuickstartFC6
"Any x86_64, or ia64 CPU is supported for running para-virtualized guests.
To run i386 guests requires a CPU with the PAE extension."
So FC6 is PAE only, and latest update to FC5 also switched to PAE xen
kernel.
RHEL5 will be PAE only too.
I don't know what Suse uses..
-- Pasi
> - pae kernels are ok for any x86 machines; slowdown caused by enabling pae
> on machines with less than 3.%G of memory, if any at all, is hardly
> measurable on machines where using xen makes sence (anyone using xen on
> Pentium-I with 128M of ram?)
>
More information about the Pkg-xen-devel
mailing list