[Pkg-xen-devel] Re: [Pkg-xen-changes] r13 - trunk/debian [signed]

[Jeremy T. Bouse [c]]

    Yeah, nothing says we can't support both until there is only a
remote chance of the older version being used. If we do that we want to
list it probably as you suggested with the linux-xen0-2.6 listed first
as that would be the first one attempted to meet the criteria.

Guido Trotter wrote:

>On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:35:52AM -0800, Jeremy T. Bouse [c] wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>  
>
>>    Was that with the newer version of make-kpkg? As you know the naming
>>was changing from using the kernel-* prefix to linux-* prefix. I believe
>>stable still uses kernel-* but testing and unstable have linux-* in use now.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Yeah, this was with the last version, backported (the one available on
>backports.org) and so should be fine for sid, etch, and sarge+backports... We
>might want to add | kernel-xen0-2.6 if we want to support packages built with a
>stable kernel-package!
>
>Guido
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pkg-xen-devel mailing list
>Pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xen-devel
>
>  
>


--
------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ] ------------------------
To: pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org.
For your security, jbouse at debian.org
digitally signed this message on 17 February 2006 at 19:51:25 UTC.
Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify.
------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] -------------------
Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAjhwa2cteGVuLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmFsaW90aC5kZWJpYW4ub3JnA
Gpib3VzZUBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAGVtYWlsIGJvZHkAgAMAAHwAfAAAAAEAAAA9KfZDgAMAAJ
8CAAIAAgACACBbbe/kx8tpUyJhmgvpubSxgZmn0dxD/KgljpsTpsvZVQEAJLQlVT52rnd
nqox8AzyHB09mthbDWqsaMF1UXyCm8B5qf8IuSf6w2K6PEjBF7fpd4PrEMUe/MVWBSQoJ
LrRUNA1qRLTsU2lnRW5k
--------------------- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] ---------------------