[Pkg-xen-devel] Changes for 3.2

Bastian Blank waldi at debian.org
Mon Dec 3 19:29:51 UTC 2007

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 06:46:21PM +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> Am Montag, 3. Dezember 2007 15:59:35 schrieb Bastian Blank:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 03:21:55PM +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> If I am not wrong, shype is just another term for acm.


> why not also the vtpm stuff? I think providing the userspace parts might be 
> usefull.

Well, it was not included in my proposals, bug I would not vote against.

> me has those kernels, too. And that these updated kernels can't be pushed 
> into stable is one thing, but what about trying to have .22-xen kernels in 
> unstable (for lenny). I think some other distros have such kernels, because 
> they can't keep stuck with .18 but at the same time want xen support for 
> their customers.

.22 was only available from Ubuntu which did not work for me at all.

> hmmm, you know something about the paravirt_ops in recent kernels? is it 
> useable already? maybe this is a better solution for the future?

Upstream is currently working on full support.

> > > we should think about including vfb/xenfb. might be useful for some
> > > people.
> > It is included in 3.1, deprecated in 3.2.
> really? why that, it was a quite new feature, so why it's already 
> deprecated? is there some alternative?

They use the qemu vnc support now.


Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20071203/a4b7ecf0/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Pkg-xen-devel mailing list