[Pkg-xen-devel] Fwd: Backport requests for 4.0
Pasi Kärkkäinen
pasik at iki.fi
Sun Dec 19 19:06:29 UTC 2010
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 02:27:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Maybe it should be worth backporting some of what's bellow?
>
Yeah, and the various IRQ related bugfixes, and the Intel CPU errate bugfix (hpet broadcast).
-- Pasi
> Thomas
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Backport requests for 4.0
> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:41:56 +0000
> From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson at eu.citrix.com>
> To: Keir Fraser <keir at xen.org>
> CC: xen-devel at lists.xensource.com
>
>
>
> Having searched through the changelogs, these three changesets apply
> cleanly to 4.0-testing and should IMO be backported unchanged:
>
> changeset: 22425:d6c2695f05eb
> user: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell at citrix.com>
> date: Tue Nov 23 19:29:13 2010 +0000
> files: tools/Makefile
> description:
> tools: fetch remote changesets when force refetching/resetting qemu
>
> changeset: 22381:2bedffabbcab
> user: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell at citrix.com>
> date: Tue Nov 09 18:15:25 2010 +0000
> files: Makefile tools/Makefile
> description:
> tools: provide explicit target for refetching/resetting qemu
>
> changeset: 22153:95c90bd63aed
> user: Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org>
> date: Tue Sep 14 17:46:21 2010 +0100
> files: tools/python/xen/util/bugtool.py tools/python/xen/xend/XendBase.py tools/python/xen/xm/main.py tools/python/xen/xm/xenapi_create.py
> description:
> tools/python: Replace python string exceptions with ValueError exceptions
>
> The bug fixed by this changeset seems to exist in 4.0-testing and it
> would be helpful to backport it there because it fixes a stochastic
> test failure. But it doesn't apply cleanly, so I or Stefano will have
> to prepare a backported version:
>
> changeset: 22552:1800f15da48a
> user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson at eu.citrix.com>
> date: Thu Dec 16 17:39:24 2010 +0000
> files: tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
> description:
> tools/xl: fix race which can leave an xl monitor processing hanging
>
> There was an awful lot of work done to libxl. I think the version of
> libxl in 4.0 is best regarded as a technology preview and I don't
> think we should try to backport even important bugfixes. It's either
> that, or try somehow to import 4.1's libxl wholesale (which would be
> awkward, given libxc changes).
>
> Ian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel at lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-xen-devel mailing list
> Pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xen-devel
More information about the Pkg-xen-devel
mailing list