[Pkg-xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Bunch of patches for cross-compilatio + RP4
Hans van Kranenburg
hans at knorrie.org
Thu Sep 17 17:51:06 BST 2020
On 9/7/20 12:00 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/19/20 1:21 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>> Initially out there as #965245.
>>
>> I strongly prefer to build ARM64 packages on non-ARM systems. Something
>> about my main build machine having twice the cores and twice the clock
>> speed. As such after many builds I've managed to generate a set of
>> patches which appear to mostly function to get functioning cross-builds
>> of Xen.
>>
>> These are NOT a 100% solution. Some packaging hacks were needed. In
>> particular ocaml-nox|ocaml-native-compilers is a major problem.
>> ocaml-nox cannot be used for cross-building. Until ocaml-nox is fixed
>> the OCAML Xen bits are going to be problematic for cross-compilation.
>> I've worked around this to the degree possible, even though the resultant
>> package will have non-functioning OCAML bits replacements should drop-in.
>>
>> Several of these can likely be squashed together. 1-2 are the two halves
>> of a bug. 3-4 are another pair, 3 is a genuine bug. 5-7 are another set.
>
> Having small patches which do one thing at a time is just fine.
>
>> Patch 12 is special, it has already been submitted to Xen for inclusion.
>> It is though *required* for functioning cross-compilation.
>
> Ok, I see it's in, so I will include that one by cherry-picking commit
> 69953e28563 instead.
>
>> Patches 9-11 are already in Xen's 4.14 branch. They are popular due to
>> the Raspberry PI 4's rather significant audience. I imagine many people
>> using Debian on ARM highly desire them.
>
> Since the packaging is now forwarded to 4.14, it's a noop indeed.
>
>> Elliott Mitchell (9):
>> Revert "debian/rules: Do not try to move EFI binaries on armhf"
>> debian/rules: Only install PV shim for supported architectures
>> debian/rules: Fix binary shuffling script for cross-building
>
> ^ I changed this to d/shuffle-binaries, it's not touching rules
>
>> debian/rules: Adjust boot shuffling script for POSIX
>
> ^ I changed this to d/shuffle-boot-files, same reason
>
>> debian/rules: Combine shared Make args
>> debian/rules: Add --host to tools configure target
>> debian/rules: Set CC/LD for cross-building
>> debian/rules: Disable OCAML build when cross-building
>> Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes."
>>
>> Julien Grall (3):
>> xen/arm: Allow a platform to override the DMA width
>> xen/arm: Take into account the DMA width when allocating Dom0 memory
>> banks
>> xen/arm: plat: Allocate as much as possible memory below 1GB for dom0
>> for RPI
>>
>> debian/rules | 43 ++++++++++++++-------
>> debian/shuffle-binaries | 45 ++++++++++++----------
>> debian/shuffle-boot-files | 7 ++--
>> tools/Makefile | 3 --
>> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 33 +++++++++-------
>> xen/arch/arm/platform.c | 5 +++
>> xen/arch/arm/platforms/brcm-raspberry-pi.c | 1 +
>> xen/include/asm-arm/mm.h | 2 +
>> xen/include/asm-arm/numa.h | 5 ---
>> xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h | 2 +
>> 10 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> I added this to my knorrie/4.14-extra branch. Note that that branch has
> d/patches which is out of sync, it's just for stashing/preparing some
> commits that are not in knorrie/4.14 yet.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/xen-team/debian-xen/-/commits/knorrie/4.14-extra
>
> I did regression smoke test build and it build and boots.
>
> Ian, can you review the packaging changes?
Yay, stuff is happening.
FTR, I just reverted knorrie/4.14 to 9625f122e8a and then added the
already accepted patches.
I also took out the 'commit patch queue' commit, and (while in q quest
to search for the best workflow/way to present a WIP branch to others to
base new patches on) pushed the branch without debrebase re-ordering
(which tears up patch sets and pushes all debian/* changes down) and
without the patch queue export.
So to build it for testing, refreshing debian/patches has to be done first.
Hans
More information about the Pkg-xen-devel
mailing list