[Pkg-zope-developers] zope2.7 *not* really ready for release

martin f krafft madduck@debian.org
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:30:08 +0200


--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Do yourself the favour and `dpkg -L zope2.7` please. Why are we
tree-linking into /usr/share already? #305854 is just one bug,
there may be many more. And we are so close to a release.

Even though the patch in the bug seems to fix the issue, I am afraid
it won't be the last. Nor am I sure that the patch itself does not
break something.

It may well be too late, but I think we *have* *to* revert to
a known-to-be-good zope2.7 package, one which does not do any
symlink magic.

Please do so ASAP! If I do not hear from you by Sunday around noon,
I will proceed to restore the /usr/lib/zope2.7 structure.

Anyway, why should zope2.7 go to /usr/share anyway? There is nothing
to share about zope2.7. It makes sense to have Products in
/usr/share so they can be shared by versions and instances. But it
does not make sense to have Zope versions in /usr/share.

Please respond ASAP. The current state of affairs is terrible.

--=20
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
"we are ready for any unforeseen event that may or may not occur."=20
                                                      - george w. bush=20

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCaWzfIgvIgzMMSnURAlLNAJwLVw76Wa8pS7oOG/7fdzHK+yIX9QCfc2Tb
rzA8sNYY5FjKcBCcwQJjSNA=
=frmG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--