[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: Let's think about removing Python 2.1 and 2.2

martin f krafft madduck@debian.org
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:11:05 +0200


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

also sprach Jonas Meurer <jonas@freesources.org> [2005.06.12.2326 +0200]:
> i asked about this recently on the pkg-zope-developers list.
> someone claimed that providing a smooth upgrade from zope 2.6 to
> 2.7 would be good, and maybe that implies that zope 2.6 will stay
> in the archive for some more time.

I don't think this will happen (the upgrade path). To me, it sounds
best just to remove zope2.6 from etch. There is little point to keep
maintaining it as it's really just outdated now.

--=20
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
=20
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
"alles sollte so einfach, wie m=F6glich gemacht sein,
 aber nicht einfacher."
                                                    -- albert einstein

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCrQdZIgvIgzMMSnURAszsAKDaVKfVKZ3vD4kMnvbrsuX0b/4SJQCgrjbk
7ZbXs9FLAjzJpsKpWblTXd4=
=y7Af
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--