[Pkg-zope-developers] licence?

martin f krafft madduck@debian.org
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:35:06 +0200


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If dzhandle is under the GPL, could upstream ever ship it as part of
Zope, which is ZPL?

We need to settle on a licence for all the work pkg-zope produces.
I am a fan of the Artistic Licence, which is not as viral as the
GPL. Thoughts?

--=20
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
"the truth is rarely pure and never simple. modern life would be very
 tedious if it were either, and modern literature a complete
 impossibility!"
                                                        -- oscar wilde

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCTAqaIgvIgzMMSnURAtUAAJ4+8YV6KHyenODzp8UgwAYnUlz7agCeOjvi
uH5SJNikajCMy6h0gWHNRsc=
=LP7b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--