[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: Work-needing packages report for May 27, 2005

[Fabio Tranchitella]

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:24:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
>=20
> >Agreeded. By the way, I've checked zope-backtalk, zope-callprofiler and
> >zope-cmfpgforum and they don't seem to be widely used by Debian users:
> >just two or three uploads, no bug reports (just a "new upstream" wishlis=
t).
> >I think the best thing to do would be to file removal request.
> Fine for me. But in this case I would even more vote for putting the=20
> packaging
> stuff into the pkg-zope repository to make live easier if somebody wants =
to
> get it back into Debian.

Why snapshot.debian.net isn't enough for that purpose? I think that pkg-zope
repository should be used for developing and packaging packages, not as a
parking area for the old ones that are not in the archive anymore. However,
I don't know.. maybe there are good reasons to do so. :)

--=20
Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org>                        .''`.
Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.            : :'  :
                                                             `. `'`
   http://people.debian.org/~kobold/                           `-
_____________________________________________________________________
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCl2TnK/juK3+WFWQRArMsAJ9O7Z878gDn3qQ9TR8hu7nPH604JwCfQ2qN
dS6rTB4ehrrmmWlybvL1AE8=
=GjcH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--