[Pkg-zsh-devel] Bug#808977: Bug#808977: zsh-common: Please add Multi-Arch: foreign

Axel Beckert abe at debian.org
Thu Dec 31 00:37:24 UTC 2015


Hi,

Elrond wrote:
> > > - The "Depends: zsh" probably should be "zsh:any"
> > 
> > Done, thanks.
> 
> ... because I think, that zsh:any requires zsh to have a
> "Multi-Arch: allowed" tag. Otherwise you can't satisfy the
> dependency.

Re-reading
https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/CrossDependencies#When_shouldn.27t_I_add_M-A:_foreign.3F
I'm reluctant to add "Multi-Arch: allowed" to the zsh package.

As far as I understand it this would mean that e.g. zsh:armhf would
satisfy z-sy-h's zsh:any dependency on an amd64 system where armhf
packages are installed for cross-compiling. That seems wrong.

OTOH, this would also mean that zsh:i386 would satisfy that dependency
on an amd64 system -- which would work, but IMHO is neither helpful
nor a real use case.

In retroperspective, I think it doesn't make sense at all to make zsh
multiarchy in any way, so even that "Multi-Arch: foreign" seems rather
useless and overkill to me now. (Re-adding #808977 to Cc again for
this discussion.) But then again, I'm not really that
multi-arch-savvy.

Or does anyone knows a real use case for zsh in a multiarchy
environment where any of the multiarchy features is really required?

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



More information about the Pkg-zsh-devel mailing list