[Python-modules-team] Bug#459716: sympy: Please split pyglet into a separate package

[Ondrej Certik]

On Jan 8, 2008 11:38 AM, Michael Hanke <michael.hanke at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:33:00AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> <snip>
> > > However, soon PyEPL will depend on pyglet and I don't think that a
> > > package dependency on sympy is the proper way to deal with it.
> > >
> > > I'd be glad if we could discuss possible ways to go on from here.
> >
> > No, the proper way, of course, is to package pyglet separately. We
> > include it in sympy
> > just because we include it in the upstream tarball (so that it's
> > selfcontained), but
> > in Debian we should create a separate package for pyglet. I just didn't have
> > time to do it.
> >
> > So if you package pyglet, that'd be awesome.
> Right, so I'll continue with out packaging and file an ITP next ;-)

Yep. :)

> > (There are actually some subtle issues, like that we need to have the latest
> > svn version of pyglet in sympy, due to some bugs in pyglet, that were fixed
> > recently, but this will settle in time.)
> Good to know. Thanks for the information.
>
> Could you drop me a note when pyglet upstream does a release that works
> with Debian sympy? But probably this will just be the next one... uscan
> will notify ;-)

Yes. Simply package the latest released version. We'll switch to it
with sympy when Alex releases a new version of pyglet and it gets to Debian.

Ondrej