[Python-modules-team] Bug#589172: please provide 2 packages: pyro and pyro4
Alexandre Fayolle
afayolle at debian.org
Thu Aug 12 08:55:56 UTC 2010
As Sylvain said, pyro4 breaks the abi and therefore this upgrade breaks any
application deployed on the system depending on pyro 3.x.
The best move imo would be to keep pyro4 in experimental, since most users are
using the official stable release (3.x branch), and reverting to pyro3 in
sid/testing.
I suggest providing 2 packages pyro and pyro4, which could at first conflict
with each other. I think upstream should be contacted, and asked to change the
namespace of pyro 4.x to pyro4 in order to ease parallel installation of both
versions.
In any case, please do not release squeeze with pyro 4.x as "pyro". This will
be very painful. We really want pyro 3.9 in squeeze, as 4.x will break
external applications.
I'll be happy to help on this matter once
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, CubicWeb, Debian : http://www.logilab.fr/formations
Développement logiciel sur mesure : http://www.logilab.fr/services
Informatique scientifique: http://www.logilab.fr/science
More information about the Python-modules-team
mailing list