[Python-modules-team] Bug#629919: python-pyside-dbg: package is enormous
Colin Watson
cjwatson at debian.org
Thu Jun 9 16:32:18 UTC 2011
Package: python-pyside-dbg
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: wishlist
* cjwatson wonders if python-pyside-dbg really needs to be so obscenely enormous
<cjwatson> (as my mirror sits there trying to download it - and of course if it fails partway through then debmirror has to start from the beginning)
<OdyX> cjwatson: I would be happy to get that reduced. Patches welcome. :-)
<OdyX> (not producing the debug flavour would divide the (huge) build time by two)
<cjwatson> could it not just be split into -dbg packages for each of the runtimes? that way at least an interrupted mirror wouldn't have to start so much earlier
<cjwatson> or is there some reason it needs to be a giant conglomerate?
<OdyX> there is no particular reason besides "-dbg is useless in most cases, so for the rare cases it is actually needed, having only one package does sound saner"
<OdyX> cjwatson: I'm not particularily opposed to the idea; though I'm not certain the work it'll need is worth it.
<OdyX> cjwatson: please file a bug; I'll think about it (I'm /away now).
<cjwatson> OK. I wasted 192MB of download on a 1Mbit link, so I do care :-)
<cjwatson> er, 1Mbit/s
(on a good day - today is not such a day)
<OdyX> (the split won't make the sum of the packages' sizes smaller than the big blob size it currently is)
<cjwatson> no, but it would reduce the penalty for interruption
<cjwatson> debmirror doesn't repeatedly download the same file, but it doesn't deal efficiently with interrupted downloads of a single very large file
My smoking ADSL line would appreciate it. Thanks. :-)
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson at debian.org]
More information about the Python-modules-team
mailing list