[Python-modules-team] Bug#629278: ITP: python-sphinx-aafig -- Embedded ASCII art figures in Sphinx documentations

Margarita Manterola margamanterola at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 20:51:46 UTC 2011


On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Nicolas CANIART <nicolas at caniart.net> wrote:

>  So is BOLA a DFSG compliant license or not ? Who is to decide ?
>  If not, what should be done with BOLA licensed software packages in main ?

This has gone unanswered for a while, I wanted to voice my opinion on
the matter.

The decision comes ultimately to the FTP-Masters, that decide to
accept or not a package with a certain license.  Even though the BOLA
license might be discouraged for new developments, it has already been
accepted for a couple of packages in Debian (darcsweb and libfiu) and
so I don't think it's useful to discuss if it should be accepted or
not, since it's already being accepted.

I'm working with Nicolas with the intention of sponsoring his package.

-- 
Besos,
Marga



More information about the Python-modules-team mailing list