[Python-modules-team] Sponsor needed for python-itsdangerous

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Fri Apr 5 15:20:02 UTC 2013

On 04/05/2013 11:07 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:

> Lintian has already this:
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/python-depends-but-no-python-helper.html
> Implementing the reverse, i.e. python-helper-but-no-python-depends,
> should be very straight-forward and give good results.

how should the reverse test deal with source packages that use dh
--with=python2 that provide multiple binaries?  should all binary
packages include ${python:Depends} in that case, or will we be
introducing a false-positive somewhere (e.g. on documentation packages,
or on packages that build both a C library and its associated python


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1027 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20130405/4372574c/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Python-modules-team mailing list