[Python-modules-team] pylama_7.0.9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen at debian.org
Wed Nov 16 01:17:41 UTC 2016

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:10:13PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> > Somehow the BSD license in pylama-7.0.9/pylama/__init__.py does not make 
> > sense. Can you please ask upstream about this?
> Submit an issue to upstream (https://github.com/klen/pylama/issues/64).

After six months upstream still does not response the two licenses
problem in pylama-7.0.9/pylama/__init__.py. Is it feasible to list this
file as dual license (BSD-3-clause or LGPL-3+) ?

ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen at debian.org>
Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen)
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790  8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20161116/df86f81c/attachment.sig>

More information about the Python-modules-team mailing list