[Python-modules-team] Bug#836585: celery: FTBFS in testing (failing tests)

Santiago Vila sanvila at unex.es
Wed Sep 14 10:08:51 UTC 2016


On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Michael Fladischer wrote:

> close 836585 
> thanks
> 
> Santiago, please provide full build logs and some hint on how you tried your
> rebuild the next time you do some sort of MBF. This would have spared maintainers
> a lot of trouble and time.

You are right and I'm sorry if the lack of a build log caused you any
trouble.

(The "some hint" thing I surely did: I clearly put "testing" in the
subject and "stretch" in the body).

For completeness, here is a build log that was created the same day I
reported this, so you can check that this problem was indeed real.

I didn't include it in the initial report for two reasons:

* The bug was very easy to reproduce in testing and it was not a
random FTBFS bug at all.

* I naively thought, being a FTBFS bug, that you would try to
reproduce it sooner. I reported this on 2016-09-04 and the first reply
from Paul was on 2016-09-13.

This was already diagnosed by Paul and it was due to the
python-openssl package in testing at the time not being ok to build
the celery package in testing at the time.

So this problem happened in stretch at least between 2016-09-04 and
2016-09-09, the last date being the time pyopenssl 16.1.0-1 migrated
to testing.

In case you still want to verify the problem, you can use
snapshot.debian.org and try building with python-openssl 16.0.0-2.

So: It is really so much work to add a versioned build-depends?
(I see that a lot of them are already versioned).

We really *never* use versioned build-depends to avoid FTBFS bugs
as some people claim?

Agreed, this does not happen anymore in stretch (I assure you that it
did when I reported it), but the source package claims buildability
with the build-dependencies shown in the build-depends field in the
control file, so it may be argued this is still a bug in the source
package. What about Ubuntu or any other Debian-derived distro which
forks unstable and not testing?

Thanks a lot.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: celery_3.1.23-5_amd64-20160904T091402Z.gz
Type: application/gzip
Size: 41986 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20160914/735cadd9/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Python-modules-team mailing list