[Python-modules-team] Bug#911904: Processed: block 911904 with 911915

[Ondřej Surý]

That way the package would be binNMUable

--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>

> On 26 Oct 2018, at 13:49, Michal Čihař <nijel at debian.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
>> On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 10:51 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> LIBTIDY_LIBRARY=$(shell readlink -f
>> /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/libtidy.so)
> 
> Well it all started from this file being absent from the package :-)
> 
>> LIBTIDY_PACKAGE=$(shell dpkg-query --search $(LIBTIDY_LIBRARY) | cut
>> -f 1 -d :)
>> LIBTIDY_LIBRARY_FILE$(shell basename $(LIBTIDY_LIBRARY))
>> 
>> then
>> 
>> sed -e “s/libtidy.so/$(LIBTIDY_LIBRARY_FILE)” lib.py
>> 
>> echo libtidy:Depends=$(LIBTIDY_PACKAGE) > python-utidylib.substvars
>> 
>> and replace
>> 
>> libtidy5deb1 | libtidy5,
> 
> I don't get what this would solve - there is nothing wrong with
> alternate dependecies as long as they both provide libtidy.so. Anyway
> same is in Build-Depends as well, where substvars are not really
> helpful.
> 
> -- 
>    Michal Čihař | https://cihar.com/ | https://weblate.org/
>