[Python-modules-team] Processed: reassign 953850 to ftp.debian.org ..., reassign 953820 to ftp.debian.org ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 953850 ftp.debian.org
Bug #953850 [tinywm] tinywm: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'tinywm' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions tinywm/1.3-9.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953850 to the same values previously set
> retitle 953850 RM: tinywm -- RoQA; python2-only; last upstream releas ein 2005, last upload 2012; leaf package; last rdep of python-xlib
Bug #953850 [ftp.debian.org] tinywm: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: tinywm -- RoQA; python2-only; last upstream releas ein 2005, last upload 2012; leaf package; last rdep of python-xlib' from 'tinywm: should this package be removed?'.
> reassign 953820 ftp.debian.org
Bug #953820 [src:foolscap] foolscap: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'src:foolscap' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions foolscap/0.13.1-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953820 to the same values previously set
> retitle 953820 RM: foolscap -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available yet; leaf package (considering testing, in unstable there are RC deps, lets remove it anyway)
Bug #953820 [ftp.debian.org] foolscap: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: foolscap -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available yet; leaf package (considering testing, in unstable there are RC deps, lets remove it anyway)' from 'foolscap: should this package be removed?'.
> reassign 953828 ftp.debian.org
Bug #953828 [src:nevow] nevow: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'src:nevow' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions nevow/0.14.2-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953828 to the same values previously set
> retitle 953828 RM: nevow -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available; no rdeps; popcon rapidly dropping
Bug #953828 [ftp.debian.org] nevow: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: nevow -- RoQA; python2-only; no python3 port available; no rdeps; popcon rapidly dropping' from 'nevow: should this package be removed?'.
> reassign 953807 ftp.debian.org
Bug #953807 [src:tftpy] tftpy: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'src:tftpy' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions tftpy/0.6.0-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #953807 to the same values previously set
> retitle 953807 RM: tftpy -- RoQA; python2-only; python3 version is non-free; no rdeps; low popcon
Bug #953807 [ftp.debian.org] tftpy: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: tftpy -- RoQA; python2-only; python3 version is non-free; no rdeps; low popcon' from 'tftpy: should this package be removed?'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
953807: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953807
953820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953820
953828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953828
953850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems