Bug#786644: Bug#1019742: should reproducible builds vary nocheck?

[Holger Levsen]

On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 08:47:47PM +0000, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Should we merge #786644 and #1019742?  Or should we consider #1019742 to be
> "have the option" and #786644 to be "enable it by default"?

I missed that question, probably because the answer is "no, they have been
filed against different packages and thus usages: 
#786644 is about tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian while
#1019742 is about src:reprotest"


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

I have a joke about trickle down economics. 99% of you won’t ever get it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/qa-jenkins-dev/attachments/20250416/68c0657f/attachment.sig>