[Qa-jenkins-scm] [jenkins.debian.net] 01/01: reproducible: add notes about running 2nd build with different cpu

Holger Levsen holger at moszumanska.debian.org
Sun Apr 19 09:33:33 UTC 2015


This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

holger pushed a commit to branch master
in repository jenkins.debian.net.

commit cbef264fc548fe172781ec0bec580c920e5a7e37
Author: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
Date:   Sun Apr 19 11:33:25 2015 +0200

    reproducible: add notes about running 2nd build with different cpu
---
 TODO | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index d1a6e87..5970cb7 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ grep '(=.*).,.$' rygel_0.24.2-1.debbindiff.html | uniq -c | sort | grep -c '^\s*
 * missing tests: variation in kernel and date and cpu type
 ** variations in date are only practical to do in c-i fashion using faketime, thus I suggest to wait for those until we test in the wild...
 ** kernel / uname output is changed (using linux64) and shall be changed more in future by doing the 2nd build on a different build host running a different kernel..., no need to do fancy stuff with building in qemu or such...
+** different cpu type: Opteron_G3  AMD Opteron 23xx (Gen 3 Class Opteron) is the most powerful one that's different to current Opteron_G4
+*** that 2nd slave can also run with a different date (or year, so probably 1984)
 
 * enable people to upload test packages, to be built in jenkins:
 	<mapreri> h01ger: another wild future request by me: allowing us to upload something and let jenkins test it. rationale: I sent (another) patch for debian-keyring, to fix a timestamp issue in debian control files (due to not_using_dh-builddeb), but there is also a umask issue. I don't want to bother me to setup the very same things jenkins tests locally (I already did too much in this regards, imho), but really people can't tests everything 

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/qa/jenkins.debian.net.git



More information about the Qa-jenkins-scm mailing list