[R-pkg-team] Bug#1043532: r-bioc-rhdf5: autopkgtest fails on s390x: 64-bit integer attributes are not read correctly

Paul Gevers elbrus at debian.org
Sat Aug 12 15:20:08 BST 2023


Source: r-bioc-rhdf5
Version: 2.42.0+dfsg-1 	
User: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always

Dear maintainer(s),

Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on s390x (our 
only big endian architecture). Can you please investigate the situation 
and fix it? I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. I 
strongly suspect the failure is due to endianess, but I'm not sure if 
it's only a test failure, or if the package won't work on big endian 
systems.

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be 
found on 
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg00002.html

115s ── Failure ('test_h5writeAttributes.R:96:5'): Adding attribute to 
dataset ──────
115s attr_back$int_attr[1] inherits from `'NULL'` not `'character'`.
115s ── Failure ('test_h5writeAttributes.R:97:5'): Adding attribute to 
dataset ──────
115s attr_back$numeric_attr[1] inherits from `'NULL'` not `'character'`.
115s ── Failure ('test_h5writeAttributes.R:130:5'): Checking other 
string options when adding attributes ──
115s `attr_back` has length 0, not length 4.
115s ── Failure ('test_h5writeAttributes.R:133:5'): Checking other 
string options when adding attributes ──
115s sort(expected) not identical to sort(names(attr_back)).
115s Types not compatible: character is not NULL
115s ── Failure ('test_h5writeAttributes.R:134:5'): Checking other 
string options when adding attributes ──
115s unname(unlist(attr_back[expected])) not identical to c("blah", 
"blah2", "blah3", "blah4").
115s target is NULL, current is character
115s ── Failure ('test_h5writeAttributes.R:149:5'): Overwrite exisiting 
attribute ───
115s attr_list$char_attr[1] not identical to "new_character".
115s target is NULL, current is character
115s
115s [ FAIL 38 | WARN 0 | SKIP 2 | PASS 974 ]


More information about the R-pkg-team mailing list