[R-pkg-team] Bug#1036227: bookworm-pu: package r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1
Andreas Tille
tille at debian.org
Wed May 17 18:48:41 BST 2023
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-shiny at packages.debian.org, 1035428 at bugs.debian.org, debian-r at lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-shiny
I'd like to announce an upload to testing-proposed-updates
[ Reason ]
As discussed on the mailing list debian-release at l.d.o[1] the
accidental upload of r-base prevents r-cran-shiny from migrating
to testing since it has some failing tests due to the r-base
version conflict. Thus an upload to testing-proposed-updates
seems an appropriate solution for this and this bug report is
about asking you for confirmation about this solution.
[ Impact ]
R-cran-shiny has an RC bug and is in danger to be not released
with bookworm. It has quite some dependencies that would be
affected.
[ Tests ]
There is just a fixed symlink in the upload to fix the RC bug.
All tests are passing as usual.
[ Risks ]
The change to the package is minimal.
[ Checklist ]
[x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[ ] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
--> will be attached once uploaded
[x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
[ Changes ]
I propose to upload the following change to t-p-u:
$ git diff HEAD^
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 21d12c3..a2b6c26 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+ * Upload to testing-proposed-updates "bookworm" due to the fact that
+ there was an accidental upload of a new version of r-base to unstable
+
+ -- Andreas Tille <tille at debian.org> Wed, 17 May 2023 07:56:25 +0200
+
r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
Nilesh Patra suggested to use version 1.7.4+dfsg-2+deb12u1 but I
personally regard my version suggestion more logical (long explanation
given in [2]).
[ Other info ]
Please confirm that I should upload to t-p-u (and raise your opinion
about the most sensible version in your eyes).
Kind regards and thanks for working as release team
Andreas.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/05/msg00623.html
More information about the R-pkg-team
mailing list