[R-pkg-team] Bug#1063275: r-bioc-rhtslib: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
Steve Langasek
vorlon at debian.org
Mon Feb 5 23:52:01 GMT 2024
Source: r-bioc-rhtslib
Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-arm at lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Hi Andreas,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
r-bioc-rhtslib as an affected package, on the basis that it depends on some
library whose ABI is sensitive to time_t, which requires
reverse-dependencies to be built with LFS support enabled, and
r-bioc-rhtslib's own ABI is sensitive to LFS support.
However, r-bioc-rhtslib's shlibs file declares a dependency on a library
package name that contains no ABI information:
$ cat DEBIAN/shlibs
libhts 3 r-bioc-rhtslib (>= 2.4.1+dfsg)
$
It is not obvious that we should rename the package to 'r-bioc-rhtslibt64'
as part of this transition. Looking at the archive, there are packages
built from the separate r-bioc-rsamtools and r-bioc-variantannotation source
packages that depend on this library.
Since there is no self-evident thing to do with the library package name
here, we will not be handling this package as part of the mass NMUs.
Instead I am filing a serious bug because partial upgrades from bookworm to
trixie on 32-bit architectures will result in ABI skew and may result in
broken behavior.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/01/msg00041.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/r-pkg-team/attachments/20240205/ecc88dec/attachment.sig>
More information about the R-pkg-team
mailing list