[Reproducible-builds] Missing dependencies aren't actually missing
Nikolaus at rath.org
Mon Mar 2 23:54:05 UTC 2015
On Mar 02 2015, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia-P8aEV1VIL9RAfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:42:32AM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia-P8aEV1VIL9RAfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:04:13PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> >> On Mar 01 2015, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia-P8aEV1VIL9RAfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 09:59:01PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> >> >> https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/s3ql.html claims that S3QL has
>> >> > We performed a rebuild, and your package still FTBFS.
>> >> > This time it looks like it fails at a test with the error
>> >> > dugong.ConnectionClosed: connection closed unexpectedly
>> >> > which is quite nasty at the sight (I don't know what that means).
>> >> > Does this mean that the package tries to connect to the internet?
>> >> No, it should not. It opens its own mock server on localhost using the
>> >> any available port.
>> > Are you sure about the "any available port" part?
>> Almost certain. I could be certain if I could see the log with the
>> failed test, but it seems that port 80 on reproducible.debian.net is
>> down at the moment:
> $weird_things_happen again.
> not sure what's wrong at that time.
Yes, 100% positive. The tests do not listen to a specific port, they
pick an available one at runtime. Whatever goes wrong is more complex
than that (and so far specific to the reproducible-builds server).
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 997 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Reproducible-builds