[Reproducible-builds] Bug#783882: jodconverter: please make the build reproducible
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Fri May 1 09:30:47 UTC 2015
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. April 2015, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> The documentation generated by javadoc includes a build dependent
> timestamp.
>
> The attached patch tells javadoc to not include a timestamp in the
> documentation.
while this works, javadoc should really be taught not to include those
timestamps by default, so that individual packages don't have to be fixed.
That said, according to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc
strip-nondeterminism should work around the issue too, anyone got an idea why
this doesnt happen?
cheers,
Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20150501/e3ca607b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Reproducible-builds
mailing list