[Reproducible-builds] on adding variations (Re: b-d recommends

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> [...] We already vary a lot of stuff between builds, and soon we'll vary
> even more (the date).
> 
> For what I'm concerned we should defer more variation once more patches
> land in the archive

I disagree, the more we know, the better. I also don't expect too many more 
unreproducible packages due to introducing day+month+year variations (maybe 
2-3%, so 450-660 packages more) and probably the same due to cpu variations, 
but I'm well aware thats guessing.

(Rebuilding with or without recommends OTOH aint an issue if the rebuilds 
follow the .buildinfo file, as we envision...)


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20150731/feeced2a/attachment.sig>