[Reproducible-builds] [Debian Wiki] Update of "ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal" by BenBoeckel

[Jérémy Bobbio]

Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
> Wiki page:
> > -   EXECUTE_PROCESS(COMMAND "date" "-u" "-d @${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH}" "+%d/%m/%Y" OUTPUT_VARIABLE BUILD_DATE)
> […]
> Is there a reason above that this example code to translate from
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to a build date doesn't produce ISO-8601-compliant
> date strings in the BUILD_DATE variable?

I assume it's because it was initially in a piece of software that used
the above format. I'd say feel free to replace by a ISO-8601 format
string if you feel it matters.

-- 
Lunar                                .''`. 
lunar at debian.org                    : :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
                                    `. `'` 
                                      `-   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20150917/8c1e9ca9/attachment.sig>