[Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Tue Sep 29 15:08:17 UTC 2015


Hi,

thanks for explaining, Emmanuel!

On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Actually I tend to prefer the reports in unstable. The reports in
> testing are often duplicates of issues already known in unstable, and
> sometimes they are already fixed in unstable when they are notified in
> testing. If we were to keep the reports for only suite I'd prefer the
> unstable reports since it gives a faster feedback on our work.

I agree and am wondering if we should actually do this, and limit (maintainer) 
notifications to unstable? What do you think?


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20150929/af3b879a/attachment.sig>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list