[Reproducible-builds] GCC patch reviewed. Proposed mail for gcc-patches mailing list

[Chris Lamb]

Santiago Vila wrote:

> So, I don't think that this patch would really be "beneficial to our
> project", as it will only serve to artificially "improve" the statistics.

Out of interest, would you extend this argument to argue for an
arbitrary build path?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby at debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-