[Reproducible-builds] GCC patch reviewed. Proposed mail for gcc-patches mailing list
holger at layer-acht.org
Tue Nov 10 10:31:43 UTC 2015
Dhole, thanks for keeping up the good work on this! +kudos too! :)
On Dienstag, 10. November 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Out of interest, would you extend this argument to argue for an
> > arbitrary build path?
> In principle, yes. I have yet to see why an executable should be
> different just because it was built in one path or in another one.
While I agree in theory, I do disagree in practise and today.
I totally agree keeping this on a todo list somewhere visible, but we also
want reproducible builds now and using a fixed path is the only solution we
found in a year of looking for it.
So, I don't want perfect to be the blocker of very good (in the case of
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Reproducible-builds