[Reproducible-builds] On which arch should Arch:all packages be built? addition to scsh-0.6, we should not be trying to build these packages on amd64:

Jérémy Bobbio lunar at debian.org
Fri Nov 27 10:12:50 UTC 2015

Santiago Vila:
> Let's take cmucl as an example:
> Package: cmucl
> Architecture: i386 all
> It has "all", yes, but implicitly I take the Architecture line
> as saying that I should only try to build the "Arch: all" package
> using a i386 autobuilder.
> Does this make sense?

I think the question can be phrased as: should architecture-independent
packages be buildable on all architectures?

My own answer would be: yes, as long as they don't mandate a particular
architecture in their Build-Depends-Indep.

Is there something wrong with this answer?

Lunar                                .''`. 
lunar at debian.org                    : :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
                                    `. `'` 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20151127/1189eb13/attachment.sig>

More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list