[Reproducible-builds] Bug#138409: Bug#138409: dpkg-dev: please add support for .buildinfo files

[Jérémy Bobbio]

Guillem Jover:
> > How about naming the field “Environment-Variables”?
> 
> Hmm, or Environment, or Build-Environment, which reminds me that I've
> found the usage of Build-Environment (as the list of transitively
> required packages) slightly confusing, precisely because the first
> thing that comes to mind with environment is the variable space.
> 
> Perhaps we should consider renaming that one? Say Build-Packages (but
> that might be confusing), Build-Depends-Used, or something else? We
> also already have a Built-Using field too (although for source
> packages not binary ones, with a name I've also found slightly
> confusing as being too generic).

Ok. What about “Environment” for the variables, and
“Installed-Build-Depends” for the list of packages?

-- 
Lunar                                .''`. 
lunar at debian.org                    : :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
                                    `. `'` 
                                      `-   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20160131/d7b7ba97/attachment.sig>