[Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

[Steven Chamberlain]

Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> It looks fixed on my end; thanks!
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/testing/armhf/khmer.html

Yep!  khmer will now only build its arch-dep and -indep binaries on
amd64.

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/unstable/armhf/index_not_for_us.html
now has 255 packages, up from 249.  So there weren't many cases of this
really.

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/unstable/amd64/index_not_for_us.html
now has 90 packages, up from 85.  One new one is:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fso-frameworkd&suite=unstable
which didn't actually FTBFS on amd64, but it only produces armel and
arch:all binaries, so it is quite reasonable that this is now only built
and tested for reproducibility on armhf.

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
steven at pyro.eu.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20160214/cfb43deb/attachment.sig>